Climate Change Math

Sir Francis Bacon claimed that for any science to be worthy of the name, it needs to be mathematical. As such, Darwin was only a naturalist until George Mendel and his pea plants discovered genetics and inheritance. Until he discovered E=MC^2, Einstein was just a guy working in a Swiss patent office. So for all the claims that Climate change is scientific, I ask them for a simply and seemingly easy answer. Show us the math. How many tons of carbon pollution over what time period will result in what increase in the global temperature? Seemingly, this is something that should be as easy to show as F=MA? And until you can, then I would suggest that the Al Gore’s and other pundits of the world not say that the science is settled, for it is clearly not.

Leave a comment